Sometimes I am electrified by a paper. Who are the acknowledged or self-proclaimed experts in this particular field. Finally, the motivation and statement of the problem are distilled into a research question, the question that the paper sets out to answer.
What do they propose to do as a next step. Do they have criticisms of the study that you haven't thought of, or do they generally support it. Read more How-Tos I first get a general idea by reading the abstract and conclusions.
As an example, here is what I drew to sort out the methods for a paper I read today Battaglia et al. The contributions in a paper may be many and varied.
Sometimes I get angry about the authors not writing clearly enough, omitting essential points and dwelling on superfluous nonsense. Then I tackle the abstract, which has been written to broadly communicate to the readership of the journal.
Do you agree with that. Try to answer the questions for yourself, as best you can. Which one would you like to do. There may be multiple questions, or just one. Does it fit with your interpretation of the paper.
So for example, when I read for background information, I will save informative sentences from each article about a specific topic in a Word document.
Pay careful attention to them. Also, a book is often not oriented towards explaining the solution to a research problem. What is your take-away message from this paper.
Does it fit with your interpretation of the paper. Reputable biomedical journals will be indexed by Pubmed. Do you see any that the authors missed. Is this really going to work, who would want it, what it will take to give it to them, and when might it become a reality.
Check out Web of Science for a more complete index of science journals. What questions would you like to raise in an open discussion of the work. Do you have anything to add to this guide. What are the limitations of that work. As an example, here is what I drew to sort out the methods for a paper I read today Battaglia et al.
Likewise, when I want to figure out how to conduct a particular experiment, I create a handy table in Excel summarizing how a variety of research teams went about doing a particular experiment. This problem intrinsically has two parts. Do they have error bars on them.
The abstract is that dense first paragraph at the very beginning of a paper. You may find it productive to try to answer each question in turn, writing your answer down. How to Read and Understand a Scientific Paper: A Step-by-Step Guide for Non-Scientists. you have to be willing and able to read the primary research literature for.
consider how to read a research paper. This discussion presupposes that you have a good reason to carefully read a research paper – for example, the fact that I assign a paper is (probably) a good reason for you to read it. You may also need to carefully read a paper if you are asked to review it, or if it is relevant to your own research.
How to read a paper On this page you will find links to articles in the BMJ that explain how to read and interpret different kinds of research papers: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research) Trisha Greenhalgh, Rod Taylor. Reading and understanding research papers is a skill which every single doctor and scientist has had to learn during graduate school.
You can learn it too, but like any skill it takes patience and practice. After the ﬁrst read-through, try to summarize the paper in one or two sentences.
Almost all good research papers try to provide an answer a speciﬁc question. Nov 13, · Edit Article How to Read Research Papers.
Three Methods: Skimming the Paper Doing a Critical Read Analyzing the Paper’s Ideas and Arguments Community Q&A Research papers can be a great resource for academic %(4).How to read a research paper